.jpg)
Early Trial Shows Promise for Medically Tailored Meals in Type 2 Diabetes
Food-as-Medicine • Diabetes Care
A 2024 pilot randomized trial tested medically tailored meals plus nutrition counseling for Medicaid-insured adults with type 2 diabetes. Results show improved food security and patient engagement—laying groundwork for larger, outcome-driven diabetes programs.
Quick Take for Physicians: In a pilot RCT, adults with type 2 diabetes receiving 10 MTMs/week for 12 weeks plus dietitian counseling showed meaningful improvements in food security and engagement with care.
HbA1c shifted modestly (−0.3%) and non-significantly—expected for a small, short pilot—but the behavioral and social improvements justify larger, longer outcome-driven trials.
Study Design
Published in Journal of General Internal Medicine (2024), Medicaid-insured adults with type 2 diabetes (baseline HbA1c ≥7.5%) and food insecurity were randomized to:
- Intervention: 10 medically tailored meals/week × 12 weeks + monthly RD telehealth
- Control: Usual care with standard nutrition materials
Key Results
- Food security: Significant improvement vs. control on the USDA module
- Engagement: Higher rates of completed diabetes and primary care visits
- Glycemia: HbA1c improved modestly (~−0.3%) but not statistically significant
- Acceptability: High satisfaction with meals and perceived support for daily self-management
Why This Matters
Food insecurity undermines diabetes control and adherence.
By addressing this directly through medically tailored meals, patients gain stable nutrition, satiety, and protein adequacy, which supports self-management and consistent engagement in care—key foundations for long-term HbA1c improvement.
How to Implement in Practice
Pragmatic Physician Pathway
- Screen for food insecurity (Hunger Vital Sign) and low diet quality.
- Prescribe ~10 diabetes-tailored meals/week for 12 weeks—prioritize fiber, lean protein, and carb consistency.
- Pair with RD telehealth every 2–4 weeks to troubleshoot adherence and adjust goals.
- Track outcomes: food security, visit completion, HbA1c/CGM time-in-range, weight, and BP.
Operational & Payer Considerations
- Coverage: Use HSA/FSA funds where possible; explore Medicaid pilots or MA supplemental benefits for eligible members.
- Workflow: Embed MTM referrals in diabetes order sets; automate RD follow-ups.
- Equity: MTMs can close nutrition access gaps for patients with limited cooking facilities or transportation.
Fast onboarding • Evidence-aligned menus • Outcome tracking
FAQs
Who is the best candidate?
Adults with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.5%) who screen positive for food insecurity or struggle with meal planning or cooking.
What “dose” should we start with?
~10 meals/week for 12 weeks is practical and well-tolerated; increase to 14/week for patients with significant functional or access barriers.
Which outcomes should we track?
Food security status, visit completion, HbA1c or CGM metrics, weight, BP, and patient-reported adherence and satiety.
Related articles
.jpg)
Across 49 States, Medically Tailored Meals Could Save Millions: State-Level Modeling
Health Affairs: MTMs could save costs in nearly every state—implications for physicians, payers, and policymakers.
Read more.jpg)
Does Meal “Dose” Matter in Heart Failure? The MEDIMEALS Trial (7 vs 21 Meals/Week)
Post-discharge heart failure trial: MTMs improve nutrition, diet adherence, and sarcopenia risk—7 vs 21 meals/week similar.
Read more.jpg)
Beyond GLP-1s: How Food-as-Medicine Can Improve Outcomes and Bend the Cost Curve
GLP-1s deliver strong outcomes, but high costs; pairing with MTMs can sustain results, improve adherence, and control spend.
Read more